Tucker Carlson Was Right * THE PANDEMIC TREATY REVEALED *
- Concerns arise over Biden rejoining WHO and negotiating a treaty that could threaten civil liberties.
- Proposed pandemic treaty may grant the WHO authority over US emergency operations, raising surveillance and control concerns.
- Introduction of “health passports” in the treaty sparks alarm about potential restrictions on individual freedoms.
- WHO’s composition, including dictatorial regimes, undermines its independence and poses a risk to democracy.
- Centralization of power in WHO reforms gives Director-General sweeping authority, infringing on rights and democracy.
Video available on:
In a recent segment, Tucker Carlson expressed concern over President Joe Biden’s decision to rejoin the World Health Organization (WHO) and negotiate a treaty that could empower the organization to permanently threaten the American way of life. Carlson warns that this move could erode civil liberties as the WHO gains authority over even the most intimate aspects of our lives. Let’s examine the potential implications of this treaty and the growing concerns surrounding it.
The concept of a “pandemic treaty” has gained attention recently, with critics voicing concerns about the WHO’s role in its development. This theory suggests that the WHO aims to assert total authority over emergency operations in the United States, potentially giving foreign powers significant control. The theory has found support among various individuals and groups, raising questions about the extent of control and surveillance such a system would impose on individuals.
One alarming aspect of the proposed treaty is the introduction of “health passports.” These passports, as mentioned by the WHO director, would be utilized during future epidemics, conflicts, the climate crisis, and other emergency situations. The prospect of permanent civil liberties abuses, reminiscent of the COVID lockdowns, administered by a foreign entity is deeply concerning.
Critics argue that the WHO’s lack of independence and the inclusion of dictatorial regimes within its ranks pose a significant risk to democracy. The recent inclusion of North Korea, a country known for human rights abuses, in the WHO’s Executive Board is cause for concern. Democracies should carefully consider recommendations put forth by an organization influenced by non-democratic regimes.
The WHO’s proposed reforms to pandemic agreements, set to take effect in early 2024, grant the Director-General sweeping powers over member states. This includes the ability to mandate lockdowns, suppress dissenting opinions, and implement vaccination passports. Such measures greatly infringe upon individual rights and the principles of democracy.
The increasing centralization of power within the WHO poses a fundamental threat to democracy. By giving international organizations authority to dictate national policies and restrict individual freedoms, we risk compromising the principles upon which democracies are built. It is crucial to critically evaluate and reject recommendations from supranational bodies when they diverge from our own interests.
Conclusion: The potential consequences of the WHO’s power grab and the proposed pandemic treaty demand our attention. While global collaboration on public health issues is important, we must be vigilant in safeguarding our civil liberties and democratic values. The current trajectory of the WHO’s reforms raises red flags and should be met with skepticism. It is crucial for individuals and nations to assess these developments and advocate for a balance between global cooperation and the preservation of democratic principles.