HE JUST EXPOSED THIS * RADICAL NEW CLIMATE PLAN *
Video available on:
- Pristine rainforests faced alarming destruction despite pledges to halt deforestation.
- Loss of primary rainforests threatens global heating mitigation and biodiversity.
- Greenhouse gas emissions rose in 2022 despite renewable energy growth.
- Skepticism is necessary in examining climate change narratives.
- Balance is crucial in addressing CO2 benefits and the greenhouse effect.
The Guardian wrote the following:
In 2022, despite the promises made by world leaders during the Cop26 summit to halt deforestation, the destruction of the world’s pristine rainforests reached unprecedented levels. Shockingly, an area equivalent to the size of Switzerland was cleared, painting a grim picture of our commitment to preserving these vital ecosystems. It is essential to delve into the details and understand the implications of this destructive trend.
From the Bolivian Amazon to Ghana, our planet’s most carbon-dense and biodiverse rainforests faced relentless devastation. Every minute, an area equal to 11 football pitches of primary rainforest was cleared for cattle ranching, agriculture, and mining. Indigenous forest communities, in some regions, were forcibly displaced from their ancestral lands due to the encroachment of extractive industries.
According to comprehensive data compiled by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the University of Maryland, the tropics lost a staggering 4.1 million hectares of primary rainforest in 2022, representing a 10% increase compared to the previous year. This relentless destruction not only undermines our efforts to mitigate global heating but also poses a significant threat to biodiversity.
Rainforests serve as one of the most effective tools for mitigating climate change and halting biodiversity loss. By preventing the destruction of rainforests, we have a better chance of limiting global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. Scientists emphasize that this ambitious goal is unlikely to be achieved unless we take immediate action to halt deforestation.
Despite the remarkable growth of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, global greenhouse gas emissions from the energy industry continued to soar in 2022. Fossil fuels still dominated the world’s total energy consumption, accounting for 82% of it. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions rose by 0.8%, highlighting the urgency of transitioning to cleaner alternatives.
Global energy consumption is projected to increase further in the coming years, potentially exacerbating greenhouse gas emissions. The Energy Institute warns that unless immediate and decisive action is taken by governments worldwide, we risk derailing the aims of the Paris climate agreement. The agreement necessitates reducing emissions by half by the end of the decade to avoid catastrophic levels of global heating.
Experts and industry leaders emphasize the pressing need for urgent action to meet the Paris targets. The president of the Energy Institute, Juliet Davenport, stresses that although renewable energy is growing, the stubborn reliance on fossil fuels is hindering progress. Governments must inject greater urgency into the energy transition to safeguard the future.The Guardian
Examining the history of climate alarmism, we find that concerns date back to the 1970s, with mainstream media outlets amplifying catastrophic views. However, it is crucial to approach such narratives with a healthy dose of skepticism. Notably, Dr. Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace, has emerged as a prominent figure challenging dogmatic and radical climate change narratives (climate plan).
Dr. Moore, who played a vital role in shaping Greenpeace’s policies for 15 years, has recently faced criticism for his divergent views on climate change. Rather than dismissing the role of CO2 emissions entirely, he suggests that their impact is insignificant compared to other factors. He highlights the historical climate fluctuations that occurred independently of CO2 levels, questioning the exaggerated focus on this greenhouse gas.
Moreover, Dr. Moore raises concerns about the concept of “Net Zero” and its potential consequences. He criticizes the idea as a genocidal policy and warns that influential organizations and elites may view it as a means to reduce the global population. He further dismisses the climate change narrative as mere fearmongering perpetuated by politicians to control the public.
The alarming destruction of pristine rainforests, despite global pledges to halt deforestation, demands our immediate attention. We must acknowledge the significant role rainforests play in mitigating climate change and preserving biodiversity. Simultaneously, we must address the persistent reliance on fossil fuels and urgently transition to cleaner energy alternatives. Skepticism should be exercised in examining climate change narratives, allowing room for rational discourse. It is only through collective action, informed decision-making, and a genuine commitment to change that we can hope to protect our planet for future generations. The time for action is now; the stakes have never been higher.The Guardian
In the realm of radical environmentalism, there exists a belief that the world is on the brink of an imminent catastrophe. However, it is crucial to approach this perspective with skepticism and consider alternative viewpoints that present a more balanced understanding of the issues at hand. In this article, we will delve into the catastrophization of CO2 and the greenhouse effect, challenging the prevailing narratives and shedding light on the positive aspects that often go overlooked.
To form an impartial judgment, it is essential to consider both the positive and negative aspects of CO2 and fossil fuels. The prevailing legacy knowledge system tends to catastrophize the negative effects while neglecting the positives. Let’s explore a more rational perspective.
One notable voice in this discussion is Alex Epstein, who argues that the increase in atmospheric CO2 levels has actually had positive effects, primarily through a process known as the fertilization effect. According to Epstein, the impact of CO2 on global warming is overstated and exaggerated.
Epstein explains that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels have contributed not only to mild and manageable warming but also to significant global greening. This claim finds support from a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change, which states that rising CO2 levels have led to significant greening of 25 to 50 percent of Earth’s vegetated lands over the past 35 years. Increased concentrations of CO2 enhance photosynthesis, thereby spurring plant growth.
A common narrative propagated by environmentalists is the intensification of the greenhouse effect and its potential to engulf the world in flames. However, this narrative is often catastrophized and leads to unnecessary moral panic. To understand the greenhouse effect, we must examine the mechanisms by which rising CO2 levels influence climate.
Epstein clarifies that the climate impacts of rising CO2 levels come from warming. While some claim that CO2 directly influences droughts or storms, the reality is that it can only influence them by causing an increase in atmospheric warmth. The greenhouse effect is not solely limited to CO2; water vapor, along with CO2 and methane, contributes significantly to this effect. Water vapor, in fact, has a much stronger greenhouse gas effect than CO2.
Epstein emphasizes that the greenhouse effect follows a diminishing, logarithmic trajectory. This means that as more CO2 is added to the atmosphere, the impact on temperature increase diminishes. The analogy of multiple pairs of sunglasses blocking out light helps illustrate this concept. Each additional molecule of CO2 absorbs less heat, resulting in a diminishing effect.
Studies suggest that the greenhouse effect from CO2 alone translates to about a 1°C increase in temperature every time the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere doubles. From a human flourishing perspective, this is a manageable and mild effect. It is important to note that the doubling of CO2 levels, which occurred around 1850, has not been repeated since. Even under high emission scenarios, doubling CO2 is not expected until the second half of this century.
While alternative forms of energy, such as nuclear power, should be explored, it is essential to recognize that plans to limit all CO2 emissions and eliminate cost-effective energy sources like fossil fuels are extreme and irrational. The rate of warming resulting from increased CO2 levels is manageable and does not justify the catastrophic narratives that suggest the annihilation of plants and animals. CO2 is an inherent part of a productive society, and therefore, eliminating it entirely would be detrimental to human progress.
It is crucial to question and critically examine radical environmental narratives. By adopting a balanced and rational perspective, we can acknowledge the positive effects of CO2 and understand the diminishing nature of the greenhouse effect. While the need for alternative energy sources is important, extreme plans that dismiss the benefits of CO2 and seek to eradicate fossil fuels should be approached with skepticism. Let us embrace a more nuanced understanding of the complex issues surrounding climate change, one that prioritizes human flourishing while pursuing responsible environmental stewardship.