RFK Jr WAS RIGHT * The Great Pandemic SCANDAL *
Video available on:
- Lockdowns had negligible impact on COVID mortality, according to a landmark study.
- Only 1,700 lives were saved in England and Wales due to lockdown measures during the first wave.
- Lockdowns resulted in significant collateral costs, including harm to children, economic setbacks, and increased debt.
- Voluntary behavioral changes proved more effective than mandatory restrictions in fighting COVID-19.
- The study calls for alternative strategies that balance public health and overall well-being.
Have you heard of Dr. Fauci? Well, let me introduce you to the British Health Minister, a man who surpasses even the level of incompetence exhibited by Dr. Fauci. This individual held the position during the pandemic, and his actions and statements were nothing short of shocking.
Firstly, he was caught on camera engaging in inappropriate behavior with a coworker during the height of the pandemic. This scandalous incident was later leaked to the world, further tarnishing his reputation. It’s astonishing to think that someone in a position of authority could be so careless and disregard the seriousness of the situation.
Not only that, but this Health Minister imposed tyrannical restrictions on the population, which have had catastrophic consequences. The impact of these measures has been far-reaching and devastating, affecting lives, livelihoods, and mental health. Yet, instead of acknowledging his mistakes and apologizing, he has chosen to advocate for even stricter measures (pandemic scandal).
Can you believe it? He wants to follow the footsteps of authoritarian states and impose even harsher restrictions, despite the clear failures of the pandemic response thus far. It’s a concerning mindset that seems to ignore the voices of reason and the disastrous effects that have unfolded due to these measures.
What makes this case even more frustrating is that this Health Minister is the epitome of privilege and education. He attended Oxford, comes from a wealthy background, and should have had the knowledge and resources to handle the situation competently. However, his actions have proven that competence cannot always be guaranteed, regardless of one’s educational background or social status.
During a Covid inquiry, the former Health Secretary emphasized the importance of being ready to “hit a pandemic hard” when it first emerges. He stated that the UK must be prepared to implement lockdowns that are “wider, earlier, and more stringent than feels comfortable.” While this may sound logical at first glance, it disregards the lessons we’ve learned from the past.
The inquiry also shed light on the flawed planning that focused more on preparing for a flu pandemic rather than a widespread respiratory disease outbreak. However, the former Health Secretary dismissed this as “not the main flaw” in the UK’s preparations. He argued that even if they had prepared for a flu pandemic, the response would have been inadequate due to a larger systemic failure across the Western world.
Incredibly, the former Health Secretary confessed that he had to overrule initial advice against quarantining people returning from Wuhan, China, where Covid-19 was first detected. He described this decision as “madness” and pointed out that international health regulations discouraged closing borders. He shifted blame to the World Health Organization (WHO), implying that the problem was not unique to the UK but rather a global issue.
It’s mind-boggling to comprehend the actions and justifications put forth by Mr. Hancock, who has proven to be one of the most incompetent politicians in recent memory. His arrogance, ideological rigidity, and lack of foresight are truly alarming. Despite the overwhelming evidence suggesting the damaging implications of lockdowns, he continues to advocate for “more lockdowns” and “harder lockdowns” in the event of another emergency.
Interestingly, Sweden offers a contrasting approach to the pandemic. Their response has been widely acknowledged as more effective, primarily due to their avoidance of strict lockdown measures. Recent research has shown the disastrous nature of worldwide lockdowns lasting for two years, highlighting the need for a more nuanced and balanced approach.
In conclusion, the British Health Minister’s performance during the pandemic has been nothing short of a debacle. His incompetence, along with his endorsement of stricter lockdowns, raises serious concerns about his decision-making and the impact of his policies. As we navigate the challenges of future emergencies, it is crucial to consider the lessons learned and adopt a more measured approach that takes into account the holistic well-being of individuals and societies.
The Telegraph reported the following:
We also have other reports, stating that the lockdowns damaged an entire generation, says a former chief medical officer in the UK.
Lockdown ‘damaged a generation’, says former chief medical officer:
Lockdown “damaged a generation” of children, the country’s former top doctor has told the Covid inquiry.
Prof Dame Sally Davies, who was chief medical officer for England from 2011 to 2019, before Prof Sir Chris Whitty, helped the Government plan for a future pandemic.
She admitted to the official inquiry that “no one thought about lockdown”.
Dame Sally said she was upset by the impact of Covid and lockdown policies on children and young people, despite being in favour of the first national shutdown.
Every day new evidence emerges of the harms of lockdown on children. Researchers find rising numbers of those with eating disorders and social anxiety, or who are self-harming and dropping out of school. And that’s far from an exhaustive list.
The fact our young suffered the effects of lockdown in many more ways than we could ever have predicted has left parents, schools and the healthcare system reeling in the virus’s wake. But today, little is being done.
Over the pandemic’s course, the number of youngsters seeking help for mental health problems soared, jumping from an estimated 12.1 per cent of children in 2017 to 17.8 per cent in 2022. The youngest children – those aged between seven and 10 – saw the biggest increase. But adolescent mental health issues have also become more prevalent, with new research this week showing that lockdowns fuelled a staggering 42 per cent rise in eating disorders among teenagers – the sharpest rise being in girls aged between 13 and 16 – and led to a similar increase in incidents of self-harm.The Telegraph
Lockdowns have undoubtedly been one of the most significant disasters in modern history. A landmark study conducted by researchers from Johns Hopkins University and Lund University has shed light on the true costs and benefits of implementing draconian measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of this comprehensive analysis have revealed that the impact of lockdowns on COVID mortality was negligible compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed on society.
To arrive at their conclusions, the scientists examined nearly 20,000 studies on COVID-19 mitigation measures worldwide. They discovered that the lockdowns implemented during the first wave of the pandemic had only saved a meager 1,700 lives in England and Wales, two countries used as case studies. This number pales in comparison to the approximately 11,000 deaths that occur in England and Wales on an average week. The study’s authors characterized the benefits of lockdown policies as “a drop in the bucket” when compared to the immense costs they imposed.
Johns Hopkins University, renowned for its esteemed medical school and its COVID-19 dashboard, which tracks cases and deaths globally, lends credibility to this groundbreaking research. The study’s authors assert that the science is clear: lockdowns have had minimal impact on COVID mortality, resulting in a policy failure of enormous proportions.
Furthermore, the study revealed the detrimental effects of lockdowns on various aspects of society. It highlighted the adverse impact on children’s health and education, the hindrance to economic growth, and the sharp increase in public debt. These consequences have become increasingly evident since the introduction of lockdown measures.
Dr. Lars Jonung, a co-author of the study and professor emeritus at Sweden’s Lund University, emphasized that this research represents the first comprehensive evaluation of the impact of mandatory restrictions. The findings unequivocally demonstrate that lockdowns were a failed promise, as they had negligible health effects but disastrous economic, social, and political costs. In fact, Dr. Jonung goes so far as to assert that lockdowns may be the most significant policy mistake in modern times.
Another co-author, Professor Steve H. Hanke, an applied economics expert from Johns Hopkins University, remarked on the shared characteristics of epidemiological models used during the pandemic. He criticized these models for their dubious assumptions, sensational predictions of disaster that often missed the mark, and the limited lessons learned from their shortcomings.
When comparing the mortality rates between countries that implemented harsher lockdowns and those that relied more on voluntary social changes, the study found only a 3.2% difference, equivalent to approximately 1,700 deaths in England and Wales. Even when considering a broader definition of lockdown that encompassed various interventions, the reduction in COVID deaths amounted to only 10.7%. This translates to approximately 6,000 deaths in England and Wales, 23,000 deaths in Europe, and 16,000 deaths in the United States during the first wave. Remarkably, these numbers represent a fraction of the 74,000 COVID deaths that occurred in England and Wales during that period.
The researchers identified voluntary behavioral changes as a more significant factor in combating COVID-19 than mandatory restrictions. The case of Sweden, which implemented fewer compulsory measures, demonstrated that changes in consumer activity, such as older individuals avoiding shops and restaurants during infection spikes, were more effective in reducing the spread of the virus (pandemic scandal).
Interestingly, Sir Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, expressed his skepticism toward lockdowns during his testimony at the COVID Inquiry. He claimed that scientists would not have proposed lockdowns without prompting from government officials. Sir Chris viewed lockdowns as a leap of imagination, an extraordinary social intervention that would not have been considered by scientific committees unless requested by a senior politician. He further noted that planning for such extreme measures rarely occurred unless ministers explicitly asked for it. This highlights the absence of comprehensive planning for pandemics and the lack of radical thinking that hindered the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is undeniable that the implications of the pandemic response and COVID-19 itself will have far-reaching impacts. The failures associated with lockdowns have contributed to widespread distrust in media, institutions, science, and medicine. Younger generations, in particular, are becoming increasingly skeptical of governmental organizations. Moreover, the economic growth of nations has been stunted, and the years ahead may be fraught with further economic challenges. The educational achievements of many individuals have also suffered due to the disruptions caused by lockdowns (pandemic scandal). The full extent of the consequences is yet to be realized.
In conclusion, the study’s findings have illuminated the true costs and limited benefits of lockdown policies implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lockdowns have proven to be a policy failure of immense proportions, with negligible impacts on COVID mortality but disastrous consequences for society. The research underscores the importance of considering alternative strategies that prioritize voluntary behavioral changes and balance the trade-offs between public health and the broader well-being of individuals and nations.