(NEW) Joe Rogan: The TRUTH On “Sound Of Freedom” *SCARY*
Video available on:
- Media silent on child rescue, raises concerns.
- “Sound of Freedom” film criticized despite importance.
- Bloomberg writer linked to pedophilia normalization.
- Doubts raised about credibility of writer and affiliations.
- Question motives, seek unbiased sources for truth.
You won’t believe what’s been happening right under our noses, concealed by the mainstream media. Have you heard about the recent rescue of 39 children in Georgia? It’s a harrowing tale that exposes the depths of human depravity. Yet, strangely enough, there is little to no discussion about it. In fact, if you dare question the narrative or seek the truth, you’re immediately labeled a conspiracy theorist. It’s astonishing how the media smears anyone who raises valid concerns about this heinous crime.
Let’s start with a movie called “Sound of Freedom.” This film, based on true events, has garnered widespread criticism from mainstream media outlets. Their headlines include statements like, “Misleading Portrayal in Sound of Freedom Raises Concerns among Anti-Trafficking Experts.” They claim that the movie’s message is potentially misleading and could lead to widespread misinformation. But why would they undermine a movie that exposes the immoral activities occurring right under our noses?
According to the US State Department, an estimated 600,000 people are trafficked every year, with approximately half of them being minors. Considering the gravity of this issue, it’s troubling that the media would criticize a film that brings attention to the problem. The article goes on to say that the movie’s glamorized depiction distracts from the harsh reality of child trafficking. They argue that most child victims already know their traffickers, and Sound of Freedom’s portrayal of shady strangers misrepresents the true nature of the crime.
But really, what does that even mean? It’s baffling to see the media downplay such an important movie that sheds light on these incredibly immoral activities. Instead of acknowledging the prevalence and danger of child trafficking, they twist the narrative to serve their own agenda of diversity, equity, and inclusion. It’s truly unbelievable.
Another article took a rather absurd stance with the headline, “Sound of Freedom Fails to Address the LGBTQ+ and Gender Non-conforming Victims of Child Trafficking.” They suggest that child victims of human trafficking are often from vulnerable minority groups, and the movie’s portrayal of a stranger stealing a child into slavery is less accurate than the influence of poverty, homophobia, transphobia, and domestic abuse in pushing children into unsafe relationships with traffickers. It’s outrageous how the media uses this as an opportunity to push their own political agenda instead of focusing on the dire issue at hand.
The media’s criticism of this crucial movie doesn’t stop there. Rolling Stone went as far as calling Sound of Freedom a “QAnon-tinged thriller,” referencing a conspiracy theory that believes Donald Trump is fighting an elite cabal of satanic pedophiles. It’s clear that the media’s biting coverage reflects their own biases, with left-leaning outlets criticizing the film while right-wing publications recognize its importance. The National Review, a conservative publication, defends the movie by stating, “It’s not ‘paranoid’ or ‘QAnon adjacent’ to bring much-needed attention to horrors that are all too real.” Yet, the film’s creators deny any connection to conspiracy theories and emphasize that it tells the story of a brave man’s actions.
We should have zero tolerance for child trafficking, yet the media seems more interested in undermining the efforts to expose and combat this heinous crime. It’s perplexing to witness their criticism of a story and a movie. Why did these big legacy media companies pass on the opportunity to raise awareness about child trafficking?
The movie studio behind Sound of Freedom, Angel Studios, challenges the Hollywood gatekeeping model that prevented this low-budget thriller about the global child-trafficking trade from being released for almost a decade. Angel Studios, based in Provo, Utah, released the film on July 4th and achieved a remarkable $14 million theatrical debut. This success caught Hollywood’s attention, forcing them to take a second look at both the film and its distributor.
Angel Studios emerged from the ashes of VidAngel, a streaming service that filtered objectionable content from movies. Major studios, including Disney, sued VidAngel, leading to bankruptcy. Eventually, the studio was sold, and the Harmon brothers co-founded Angel Studios. Their previous successes, such as ‘The Chosen,’ a serialized drama about the life of Jesus, raised over $100 million through fan funding for production costs. With the crowdfunding model, Angel Studios raised $5 million for the print and advertising budget of Sound of Freedom.
The studio’s president, Jordan Harmon, and SVP of Global Distribution, Jared Geesey, expressed that the film’s performance exceeded expectations, thanks to their loyal crowdfunding community known as the Angel Guild. This group of about 100,000 individuals was consulted before the decision to distribute the film. It’s worth questioning why Hollywood and other media studios passed on this opportunity to shed light on such an important issue.
A viral tweet by Joy Reborn shed light on Disney’s involvement in the movie. Reborn claimed that Disney owned the rights to Sound of Freedom after acquiring 20th Century Fox in 2019 but chose not to release it. The tweet garnered 193,000 views, suggesting a widespread interest in understanding why Disney would suppress a film about saving human trafficked children. The fact that it took Angel Studios and Elon Musk to bring this movie to the public’s attention is alarming. It seems that the media’s agenda goes against the very idea of protecting innocent lives.
Both the director of Sound of Freedom and Neal Harmon, the CEO of Angel Studios, confirmed that Disney shelved the movie after acquiring 20th Century Fox. Harmon explained that Eduardo Verastegui, the film’s producer, spent over a year trying to regain the rights from Disney. However, just as they were preparing to release it, the COVID-19 pandemic struck, causing a further delay. Director Monteverde considers the delay a blessing in disguise, believing that the audience is now more ready than ever to confront the atrocities of child trafficking happening worldwide.
It’s high time we put aside political agendas and confront the rise of pedophilia in our society. Child trafficking is an abhorrent crime that demands zero tolerance. The media’s role should be to raise awareness and support efforts to combat this issue, rather than undermining important films that expose the truth. We must ask ourselves why the media is critical of stories like this and why they shy away from shining a light on these dark corners of our society. It’s time to demand transparency and justice for the victims of child trafficking.
Let’s delve into an interesting article by Zero Hedge that sheds light on a writer at Bloomberg who criticized the film “Sound of Freedom.” It turns out that this particular writer has a questionable background, raising concerns about his credibility and intentions.
The article highlights Noah Berlatsky, a contributor to the liberal mainstream media. Despite his status as a news contributor, Berlatsky has a history of advocating for the normalization of pedophilia. Yet, ironically, he vehemently criticized “Sound of Freedom” for perpetuating dangerous tropes and accused the movie of packaging various QAnon conspiracy theories. However, it’s crucial to consider Berlatsky’s own affiliations before taking his critique at face value.
In 2021, Berlatsky became the communications director at Prostasia, a non-profit organization that claims to protect children from sexual abuse. While this may sound commendable, a closer look at Prostasia’s published content reveals a more sinister motive. The organization uses the guise of protecting children to promote the normalization of pedophilia, an utterly perverse ulterior motive.
It’s important to note that Berlatsky was a spokesperson for M.A.P. (minor-attracted person) advocacy group Prostasia, advocating for the rights of pedophiles. He even tweeted that pedophiles are stigmatized and labeled deviants for hateful purposes, going as far as calling sex offender registries racist.
In a 2018 piece discussing the FOSTA bill, which eventually became law as the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Trafficking Act, Prostasia criticized the legislation for stigmatizing pedophiles. Their criticism was riddled with terms like “minor attracted persons” and the idea of the virtuous pedophile—a person attracted to children who supposedly exercises self-restraint and refrains from abusing them. Prostasia champions this notion as a moral paragon. It’s evident that Prostasia takes a pro-pedophilia stance, as they even facilitate a safe space for pedophiles through their MAP Support Club Partnership.
Berlatsky’s controversial views don’t end there. In 2016, he published an article titled “Child Sex Workers’ Biggest Threat: The Police” in The New Republic. While he does touch on the treatment of victims of child trafficking as criminals, his language and vernacular throughout the piece attempt to normalize sex between minors and adults. He alienates youth involved in the sex trade from the idea of being victims of human trafficking and suggests that minors should be free to work in the sex trade. His article echoes the tone and content found on Prostasia’s platform.
If there were any doubts about Berlatsky’s stance, a quick glance at his social media history reveals his opposition to the stigmatization of pedophiles. He has also shown support for “trans-kids,” and his controversial tweets extend to criticizing the parent-child relationship, an integral part of the transgender movement.
Despite Berlatsky’s opposition to the traditional nuclear family structure, he himself is married with children. However, his family represents a departure from the conventional. In a February 2023 piece for Yahoo News, titled “My Wife Is Bisexual And Nonbinary, And My Daughter Is Transgender. My Queer Family Helped Me Better Understand Myself And My Masculinity,” Berlatsky describes how his family aligns with his radical ideology. He chronicles his daughter’s journey through apparent gender dysphoria, starting with coming out as bisexual in middle school and later identifying as a transgender lesbian in high school. Berlatsky attributes his wife’s sexual orientation and nonbinary gender identity as pillars of support for their handling of their daughter’s struggle with gender identity.
It’s essential to question the motives and credibility of individuals like Berlatsky, who criticize films like “Sound of Freedom.” Their associations and past actions reveal a disturbing agenda that goes against the protection of children. We must remain vigilant and seek unbiased sources of information to uncover the truth behind these narratives.
