Robert F Kennedy Jr JUST CALLED OUT MARK ZUCKERBERG (Facebook Censorship)
Video available on:
- Rep. Jim Jordan revealed “smoking-gun documents” showing Facebook’s censorship for the Biden administration.
- Investigation exposed collusion between CISA, tech companies, and government-funded groups in censoring Americans.
- CISA considered anti-misinformation “rapid response team” and moved censorship operation to a CISA-funded non-profit.
- Advisory committee members feared public exposure, leading CISA to remove references to its censorship activities.
- Suppressing alternative views under the guise of combating misinformation hinders open debate and societal progress.
Today, we want to share with you some eye-opening information about Facebook’s alleged censorship on behalf of the Biden administration. It all came to light when Rep. Jim Jordan, a politician from Ohio, shared what he called “smoking-gun documents” in a lengthy social media thread.
According to Jordan, these documents are proof that Facebook and Instagram censored posts and changed their content moderation policies due to pressure from the Biden White House. During the first half of 2021, there was immense pressure on social media companies like Facebook to crack down on what was perceived as “misinformation.” An April 2021 email from a Facebook employee revealed that they were facing external pressure, including from the Biden White House, to remove certain posts.
One example mentioned by Jordan was a meme featuring Leonardo DiCaprio pointing at a TV with a caption about COVID vaccines. Facebook hesitated to remove it, citing concerns about free expression in the US. However, a Biden senior adviser named Andy Slavitt seemed outraged that the post was still up and allegedly disregarded the First Amendment.
As a consequence, Facebook felt pressured to repair its relationship with the White House to avoid any adverse actions. One of their vice presidents, Brian Rice, expressed concern that they were at a crossroads with the White House. Facebook apparently wanted to take stock of their relationship with the administration and their internal methods.
This wasn’t an isolated incident, though. Jordan listed other instances where the Biden White House expressed displeasure over Facebook’s lack of censorship. In July 2021, President Biden publicly criticized Facebook and other social media platforms, accusing them of “killing people” by not censoring alleged misinformation. Facebook eventually changed its policies in response to this pressure.
But it wasn’t just the White House pushing for censorship. Jordan claimed that Facebook also changed its policies due to pressure from Biden’s Surgeon General, censoring members of the so-called “disinformation dozen” for sharing COVID-related claims (Facebook Censorship).
These documents, along with others, paint a troubling picture of the Biden administration allegedly abusing its powers to coerce Facebook into censoring Americans. This kind of behavior is concerning as it hinders free and open discourse on critical public issues. It took the House Judiciary Committee’s announcement of holding Mark Zuckerberg in contempt for Facebook to produce these internal documents, suggesting government pressure played a role in the censorship.
Recently, the House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government released an interim staff report exposing collusion between the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), major technology companies, and government-funded third parties to censor Americans. This investigation aims to uncover how the federal government coerced and colluded with private companies and third-party groups to suppress certain viewpoints, potentially violating our First Amendment rights.
The report sheds light on the involvement of CISA in censoring Americans independently and through intermediaries. It’s alarming to see how these agencies have been entangled in limiting free speech, and this investigation is crucial to ensuring transparency and accountability.
As the investigation continues, it’s essential for us to stay vigilant and hold those in power accountable for protecting our right to free expression. The First Amendment is a cornerstone of our democracy, and any attempts to undermine it should be thoroughly investigated. The House Judiciary Committee’s commitment to uncovering the truth and its willingness to enforce contempt if necessary are vital steps in safeguarding our freedoms.
We must ensure that the internet remains a space for diverse opinions, robust discussions, and open debates. By staying informed and engaged, we can play our part in defending the principles that make our society thrive. So, keep an eye on this developing situation, and let’s continue to champion free speech in the digital age.
The revelations about CISA’s involvement in censorship and suppression of speech are deeply troubling. This trend of labeling information as “mis/disinformation” can serve as a Trojan Horse, allowing those in power to push their authoritarian agendas and stifle open debate and criticism. It’s essential to recognize that the free flow of ideas is crucial for societal progress, and censoring viewpoints hampers our ability to grow and learn from diverse perspectives.
Throughout the pandemic, we witnessed the silencing and censorship of reputable individuals and scientists whose views didn’t align with the prevailing consensus or were considered controversial. Sadly, history has shown that some of these silenced voices were proven correct in their assessments later on. This underscores the danger of suppressing alternative views under the guise of combating misinformation.
I can personally relate to the frustration of being censored online. As a content creator, I’ve experienced instances where my opinions and ideas were flagged or removed without a clear explanation. It’s disheartening to see your voice silenced when you’re trying to engage in thoughtful discussions and share valuable insights with others.
The internet was once hailed as a platform for free expression and open dialogue, but the increasing use of censorship by powerful entities raises concerns about the erosion of our digital freedoms. We must remember that diverse perspectives, even if they challenge mainstream beliefs, play a crucial role in driving progress and sparking innovation.
During the pandemic, many views labeled as “conspiracy theories” or “mis/disinformation” eventually turned out to be true. This highlights the importance of allowing all perspectives to be heard and critically examined, rather than simply dismissing them outright.
As individuals, we must remain vigilant in defending our right to express ourselves freely and challenge the status quo when necessary. Let’s continue to demand transparency and accountability from those in power, ensuring that censorship is not used as a tool to suppress inconvenient truths or dissenting opinions.
In conclusion, the recent revelations about CISA’s activities and the broader issue of censorship in the digital age serve as a wake-up call for us to protect our right to free expression. By advocating for an open and inclusive internet, we can foster a society where diverse ideas can flourish, and our collective understanding can thrive. Let’s stand united against censorship and uphold the principles that make our democracy strong and resilient.